<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Normal service resumes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/2008/09/normal-service-resumes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/2008/09/normal-service-resumes/</link>
	<description>Get it off your chest</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:41:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/2008/09/normal-service-resumes/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 08:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/blog/?p=90#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jules, that&#039;s how I remember it too. I&#039;ve been looking at this now for a couple of days and it still makes no sense at all.

So, Mr Darling, just what is your position?

What about:

&lt;em&gt;&#039;Having considered all the definitions of position I have concluded that it would be unsafe to take a position on this matter as, at some point in the future, I may have to review my position on a related matter which may affect my position on this matter. I have, therefore, decided not to take a position on this matter at this point but I reserve the right to take a position in the future. I do not believe that this decision will necessarily affect any position(s), on any matters, that I have taken in the past or may take in the future. I am unable to confirm or deny that I have taken any positions on anything to date...&#039;&lt;/em&gt;

:-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jules, that&#8217;s how I remember it too. I&#8217;ve been looking at this now for a couple of days and it still makes no sense at all.</p>
<p>So, Mr Darling, just what is your position?</p>
<p>What about:</p>
<p><em>&#8216;Having considered all the definitions of position I have concluded that it would be unsafe to take a position on this matter as, at some point in the future, I may have to review my position on a related matter which may affect my position on this matter. I have, therefore, decided not to take a position on this matter at this point but I reserve the right to take a position in the future. I do not believe that this decision will necessarily affect any position(s), on any matters, that I have taken in the past or may take in the future. I am unable to confirm or deny that I have taken any positions on anything to date&#8230;&#8217;</em><br />
 <img src='http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/2008/09/normal-service-resumes/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 12:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.the50plusclub.co.uk/blog/?p=90#comment-49</guid>
		<description>BT: Will you increase income tax to pay for the increase in borrowing?

AD: This is not the time to be imposing additional burdens and I really don&#039;t think I can make the position any clearer than that.

BT: I don&#039;t understand. Will you increase income tax to pay for the increase in borrowing? Yes or No.

AD: This is not the time to be imposing additional burdens and indeed actually, this month, the vast majority of basic rate taxpayers, the 22 million people, are actually getting a tax rebate, a tax cut... I really don&#039;t think I can make the position any clearer than that. Basic rate taxpayers are receiving a tax cut.

BT: Perhaps I&#039;m not clever enough to understand. Will you increase income tax to pay for the increase in borrowing? Yes or No.

AD: This is not the time to be imposing additional burdens and I really don&#039;t think I can make the position any clearer than that.

BT: I don&#039;t see how you can borrow money without repaying it back, so we&#039;ll have to agree to differ</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BT: Will you increase income tax to pay for the increase in borrowing?</p>
<p>AD: This is not the time to be imposing additional burdens and I really don&#8217;t think I can make the position any clearer than that.</p>
<p>BT: I don&#8217;t understand. Will you increase income tax to pay for the increase in borrowing? Yes or No.</p>
<p>AD: This is not the time to be imposing additional burdens and indeed actually, this month, the vast majority of basic rate taxpayers, the 22 million people, are actually getting a tax rebate, a tax cut&#8230; I really don&#8217;t think I can make the position any clearer than that. Basic rate taxpayers are receiving a tax cut.</p>
<p>BT: Perhaps I&#8217;m not clever enough to understand. Will you increase income tax to pay for the increase in borrowing? Yes or No.</p>
<p>AD: This is not the time to be imposing additional burdens and I really don&#8217;t think I can make the position any clearer than that.</p>
<p>BT: I don&#8217;t see how you can borrow money without repaying it back, so we&#8217;ll have to agree to differ</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

